As opposed to the East Philosophy, Aristotles divides everything into two black-white and yes-no categories. Also, in Aristotle Philosophy, there exist no middle states for logical concepts and results from logical reasonings. However, there exists no specified division in fuzzy thought and different elements belong relatively to various concepts and subjects. Present paper is based on this principle that, in reality world, everything lies on the space between two black and white limits, seeking to convey readers this message that although black-white (Aristotle) logic is in existence, it is a particular form of state of broader fuzzy logic. With the help of fuzzy logic, present paper tries to study heavey burden rule stating acceptance by

The present research performed with the purpose of investigating the relationship between organizational health with infractions and administrative corruption in Isfahan’s real estates and documents registration office by descriptive method of correlation type. The statistical participants of this research were all 195 employees of this organization. Then, 120 were chosen to participate in present research by orderly random sampling method. As useful tools two questionnaires including 44 questions eg Hoy et al (1998) were used. The reliability and validity of standard of organizational health and questionnaire about infractions and administrative corruption were confirmed by experts. The reliability of questionnaires, organizational healt

The necessity of immunity of parliament and its Members has led to a determination and assurance of particular privilege in the Constitutions or ordinary laws in the great majority of countries. This legal institution serves to provide freedom of speech and to maintain the independence of representatives in the exercise of their duties without undue interference or fear.To define and justify the necessity of it, different theories like" the prestige of representatives' legal personality" and" doctrine of necessity" have been introduced. The legal supports which observe the parliamentary privilege can be generally studied in two categories with distinct descriptions and effects: first, demonstration of the benefits and utilization of privile

The necessity of immunity of parliament and its Members has led to determine and assure particular privilege in the Constitutions or ordinary laws in the great majority of countries. This legal institution is to provide freedom of speech and to maintain the independence of representatives in the exercise of their duties without undue interference or fear.

The Principle of legality of crimes and punishments (nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege) refers to the fact that an act is not considered a crime and deserves no punishment, unless the Legislator determines and announces the criminal title and its penalty before.

Mohammad Jafar Habibzadeh Associate Professor, Department of Law, Tarbiat Modarres University Seyed Doraid Mousavi Mojab Ph. D. Student of Criminal Law and Criminology, Tarbiat Modarres University The necessity to protect to parliament and its members led to determine and assure a particular privilege named parliamentary immunity in the Constitutions or ordinary laws of majority of the countries. This legal institution has been predicted to provide freedom of speech and to maintain the independence of representatives (members of parliament) in order to do their duty favorably. To define and justify the necessity of it, different theories I ike" good service theory" and" the prestige of representatives' legal personality" have been introduce